<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commentaires sur : Server-side OSGi, is it really useful ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itaware.eu/2008/10/19/server-side-osgi-is-it-really-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itaware.eu/2008/10/19/server-side-osgi-is-it-really-useful/</link>
	<description>Sébastien Letélié and Cyril Balit weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Par : Ed Merks</title>
		<link>http://www.itaware.eu/2008/10/19/server-side-osgi-is-it-really-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Merks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itaware.eu/?p=327#comment-370</guid>
		<description>While it&#039;s certainly true that WebSphere uses OSGi to implement the application server, no attempt is made to surface this fact to the users.  It&#039;s effectively completely hidden from them.  So the users of WAS continue to use JEE APIs and are not in a position to exploit OSGi&#039;s benefits directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s certainly true that WebSphere uses OSGi to implement the application server, no attempt is made to surface this fact to the users.  It&#8217;s effectively completely hidden from them.  So the users of WAS continue to use JEE APIs and are not in a position to exploit OSGi&#8217;s benefits directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

